Task – Relational Dialectics Details – Dialectical Tensions Are Present In Every Relationship. Read The PDF In The Week 12 Folder On D2L Called “Relational Dialectics.”


Task – Relational Dialectics
Details –
Dialectical tensions are present in every relationship. Read the PDF in the Week 12 folder on D2L called “Relational Dialectics.”
Choose one relational example (i.e. you and one other person) and choose a set of tensions (connection and separation, predictability and novelty, or openness and closedness).
Write about a situation with someone where your chosen set of tensions was present. Focus especially on – PRAXIS — what practical part you were playing in causing the tension (your choices and actions).
1 page minimum.
5 points

Instruction Files

Essay on Relational Dialectics Theory

Comparing relationships to unicycles seems strange or unlikely, however the constant strive for balance against opposing forces is a perfect description for relational dialectics theory (Griffin, 2009). Barbara Montgomery, an interpersonal communication scholar, describes riding a unicycle as a task of contradicting forces, constantly pulling against each other in a tug-of-war motion. The best way to control the wheel is by the constant changes in movement, adapting one way or the other, to maintain control over the fall (Griffin).
When Montgomery and Baxter first started researching interpersonal relationships they were surprised by the feedback they discovered from their interviews (Griffin, 2009). They found multiple truths to a lot of the stories that the participants were telling. The stories that people told did not even make sense because the narrators would constantly contradict themselves (Griffin).
Baxter and Montgomery argue that, “social life is a dynamic knot of contradictions, a ceaseless interplay between contrary or opposing tendencies,” (Griffin, 2009, p.154). This paper agrees with Baxter and Montgomery’s explanation of relational dialectics. Moreover, this paper expands that Baxter and Montgomery’s ability to state that relationships are striving for balance is the key component. Balance is vital in relational dialectics because it produces positive outcomes and is the reason that contradictions occur. This paper will look at the main components of relational dialectics theory, current literature that supports this argument, and future application of the research (Griffin).
Some people may view a conflict or a fight as a warning sign in relationships or a “red flag” that it is not going to last. How…

Relational dialectics theory articles

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now


This research of Relational Dialectics Theory refers to the book titled A Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by Steve Duck. The title “A Dialectical Perspective on Communication Strategies in Relationship Development,” written by Lesile Baxter, presents the basic strategies for an ideal relationship . The theories in which Baxter discusses describe the communication actions that a coulpe must use to establish, maintain, and dissolve their personal relationships. Contradiction is the central concept of relational dialectics. It refers to the dynamic interplay between unified oppostions. By managing three basic cotradictions; which are Autonomy-Connection, Novelty-Prediction, and Openness-Closedness, a couple can maintain a stable and healthy relationship with each other and together, accomplish success.

Baxter bases her dialectical theory on the three bipolar pairs that cause contradictions. The primary or principle contradiction is Autonomy-Connection. A web of secondary contradictions, Novelty- Prediction and Openness-Closedn…

An Application of Relational Dialectics Essay

An Application of Relational Dialectics

Leslie Baxter and Barbara Montgomery are interested in the communication that occurs in close relationships. I am going to focus on the three relational dialects which consist of connectedness-separateness, certainty-uncertainty, and openness-closedness. These three dialects are central to Baxter’s and Montgomery’s theory but they want to go more indepth than previous theorists have on these specific dialects. I will discuss this theory in the context of “When Harry Met Sally.”


Billy Crystal plays “Harry,” a man who believes that women and men can not be friends. Men always have sex on their minds so it interferes with the chance to be plutonic friends with women. He shows a separateness from women because he doesn’t want to get to close to Meg Ryan who plays “Sally,” a woman who believes the exact opposite. Their relationship starts out with contraditions and continues throughout the movie.

As years pass, they meet up with one another again and continue their argument over the relationship between men …

Relationship Dialetics Sample Essay 2

Love is not always about you feelings. Sometimes real love is about what you do no matter how you feel. Webster defines a relationship as, “an emotional or other connection between people. ” My definition of a relationship is an agreement of sacrifice, trust, and friendship between two people. Relational Dialectics Theory explains the tensions in the personal relationship I have with my boyfriend, Claude Jackson. In this paper I will discuss the theory of Relational Dialectics, Case Analysis, Recommendations, and Reflection. Theory Relational dialectics is the competing psychological tensions in a relationship,” (Verderber, Verderber, and Sellnow 2010, p. 86). The theory of relational dialectics explains how different aspects of a relationship to attract opposites to complement one another. According to the theory, people involved in relationships experience internal, conflicting attractions causing relationships to be in a constant state of instability, known as dialectical tension. The pressures of these tensions occur in a wavelike fashion over time.